Sex, Currency, and the Barter System: Rethinking Value Through Radical Exchange
Sex, Currency, and the Barter System: Rethinking Value Through Radical Exchange
In a world where nearly everything has a price, money has come to dominate the ways we understand value, relationships, and even morality. The age-old adage “money is the root of all evil” might sound like hyperbole, but its resonance reflects how deeply monetary systems influence modern life—for better or worse. Money can buy medicine and mansions, but it also buys power, obedience, silence, and at times, suffering. It allows people to bypass social obligations and community responsibility, replacing cooperation with convenience.
But what if we thought differently about value? What if we looked to more primitive or experimental economic systems—like bartering—to understand how we might rewire our society around pro-social behavior rather than capital accumulation? And what if, instead of money, something innately human became the currency of exchange?
The Barter System and Its Limits
Barter predates money. It’s simple: I give you something you want, and you give me something I want. No coins, no bank accounts—just mutual agreement. The catch, of course, is equivalency. If I have a loaf of bread and you have a handmade chair, how do we measure their relative worth? The barter system struggles when values are not easily comparable. That’s where money emerged: as a universal symbol of value, making trade seamless. But with that abstraction came a whole new set of problems—money allowed people to extract value without offering anything tangible in return. It enabled hoarding, corruption, and the commodification of basic human needs.
Now, imagine a barter economy based not on objects, but on behavior. Not on accumulation, but reciprocity. What if sex—consensual, meaningful, and freely given—was the reward for pro-social action? What if, instead of currency rewarding competition and greed, we had a system that rewarded empathy, generosity, and connection?
Sex as Currency?
Before you bristle at the idea, it’s important to clarify: this isn’t a suggestion of transactional sex in the commercial or exploitative sense, but rather a thought experiment. We already live in a culture where sex is often traded, implicitly or explicitly, for power, validation, resources, or status. It’s already functioning in many cases as a form of currency. What this thought experiment proposes is not commodifying sex further, but decoupling it from the capitalist system altogether—and reimagining it as a natural and ethical form of exchange embedded in communal values.
In this system, sexual intimacy wouldn’t be bought or coerced, but offered as a gift within a framework of mutual appreciation and shared values. A society like this would require radical rethinking of consent, equity, and agency, and would need a cultural ethic that sees sex not as something to be taken or purchased, but something earned through social reciprocity and trust.
Burning Man
To see a glimpse of how this might work, look at Burning Man, the temporary city erected annually in Nevada’s Black Rock Desert that hosts 80,000 people each year. Burning Man is called burning Man because literally people are getting together to show their frustration and their collective joy. It's a collective symbolic action burning of the patriarchal system I.e "the man" a 50 ft tall sculpture made of wood that is burned at the end of the festival in the shape of a man.
At Burning Man, money is meaningless. You can’t buy food or souvenirs. Everything is gifted, bartered, or shared in a communal spirit. Need a meal? Someone will offer it. Want a massage or a handcrafted necklace? You’ll likely receive it with no strings attached. The city is built on the principle of radical self-expression and radical inclusion—but just as importantly, radical gifting. It’s not a utopia, but it is a living experiment in what happens when you remove money and re-center value around connection and contribution.
Within this framework, prosocial behaviors—like cooking for strangers, cleaning up after events, helping someone build a structure—are rewarded with trust, affection, and sometimes intimacy. Not because there's a direct trade, but because social value naturally begets social connection.
A Culture of Earned Intimacy
What would it mean to live in a world where emotional and sexual intimacy was a social currency—a reward for kindness, accountability, and communal care? Could this rebalance power away from the wealthy and toward the socially generous? Could it break the grip of money on our most intimate experiences and re-root them in empathy?
Of course, there are dangers. The idea of "earning" sex can quickly resemble coercive logic if not grounded in consent and mutuality. It must be built on autonomy and choice, not entitlement. But what if we could collectively redefine the idea of earning—not as manipulation or coercion, but as cultivating the kind of person others want to be close to?
We already use phrases like "emotional labor" and "putting in the work" in relationships. The real question is: can we take that work seriously as a social exchange? Can we build a culture where sex isn’t bought, but given in response to genuine care and contribution?
Maybe the real revolution isn’t eliminating currency, but redefining what’s worth trading for. Hope to see you this summer at the BURN!
A look at the many burns happening around the World!
Sources:
The Burning Man Regional Network https://regionals.burningman.org/
Burning Man ethnography: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/339919
Bartering: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4225147
Intimacy and Coersion: https://www.google.com/books/edition/Intimacy_or_Integrity/TOQ6onCqYu4C?hl=en&gbpv=0
Burning Man through the eyes of an army man: https://www.coffeeordie.com/article/burning-man-army-sniper